An element (e.g. a sensor) is able to meet the requirement of hardware safety integrity architectural constraints in IEC 61508 by implementing one of the two possible routes (IEC 61508-2, 7.4.4):
SFF is not examined in Route 2H approach.
Both Type A (IEC 61508-2, 7.4.4.1.2) and Type B (IEC 61508-2, 7.4.4.1.3) elements are allowed to follow Route 2H as long as certain requirements are met. Examples of Type A elements are valves, actuators, etc. Examples of Type B elements are flame detectors, PLC, etc.
This blog article, written by my colleague Loren Stewart, provides an excellent insight on the Route 2H requirements for Type A element.
For Type B element, an additional requirement is “All type B elements used in Route 2H shall have, as a minimum, a diagnostic coverage of not less than 60 %.” (IEC 61508-2, 7.4.4.3.4).
exida has interpreted this to mean not just a simple 90% confidence level in the uncertainty analysis, but a high confidence level in the entire data collection process. As IEC 61508, ed2, 2010 does not give detailed criteria for Route 2H, exida has established the following:
This set of requirements is chosen to assure high integrity failure data suitable for safety integrity verification.
Examples of Type B element meeting Route 2H criteria can be found at exida SAEL website.